Garrett Ballengee: How not to bring West Virginia back to life (Daily Mail)
There is little doubt that West Virginia finds itself in a perilous fiscal situation, and, as perilous situations often present, West Virginia faces a choice.
Taxpayers were told by West Virginia Gov. Jim Justice in his State of the State address that West Virginia can: A) raise taxes or B) die. Well, now, that hardly seems like a choice, at all — clearly, right-thinking West Virginians must choose “A.”
Wrong. Dead wrong.
Faced with a deficit of nearly $500 million next year and a deficit of even larger proportions the following year, steady population decline, lackluster educational outcomes and opportunities and a smorgasbord of harrowing health statistics, it is time to recognize the state is already, in a sense, dead.
As such, the operative question is not how can we keep West Virginia alive, but how we can best bring West Virginia back to life.
The state has been, essentially, offered two competing visions: 1) ever-growing government and centralization paid for through increased taxation or 2) comparatively smaller government, with more efficiently delivered services, paid for through a relatively smaller tax burden.
West Virginia has experience with the first option and, despite commentary to the contrary, little to no experience with the second option.
Let’s compare the last few years. Despite a smaller population, the state of West Virginia still employs hundreds more workers than it did in 2011.
If enacted, the governor’s proposed Fiscal Year 2018 budget increases government spending by about $318 million more than FY2017’s budget, and, in constant dollars, would be nearly half a billion dollars in more spending than 2011.
Thus, every man, woman and child in West Virginia in 2017 would have to shoulder a nearly $270 annual burden of increased government spending per capita since 2011.
That’s an $810 annual increase for a family of three over that same time period. If this were a publicly traded company, shareholders would revolt and corporate officers would be run out of office.
One almost has to marvel at the new taxes and fees that have been enacted, proposed or considered over the last year as the means for paying for more government spending: tobacco taxes, e-cigarette taxes, sales tax increases, toll hikes, taxes on sugary beverages, alcohol tax increases, severance tax increases, income tax surcharges, gasoline tax increases and the list goes on.
Now, this bounty of taxes and fee hikes could work, depending on your definition of “work.” However, there is one ingredient that can, and does, wreck the most ambitious of tax-and-spend dreams: the U-Haul trailer.
A depressed environment forces people to leave. As most West Virginians know, West Virginia had a considerably larger population in 1950 than it does today; a time period over which the total population in the United States increased by more than double.
Last year, Illinois, a state with a population over seven times that of West Virginia’s, was the only state to have had a greater population loss than West Virginia.
While death often appears to come suddenly, it is rarely a catastrophic event that is the proximate cause. It can take years, perhaps even decades, for an affliction to show itself, then, one day, you look around and wonder quietly why all of your neighbors have left, your favorite grocery store closed, and the bowling alley in town recently shut down.
Charleston can continue to take more and more money out of the pockets of every pop drinker in Kenova and every cigarette smoker in Clarksburg and perhaps the deficit will shrink.
But, eventually, folks in Kenova and Clarksburg begin to think that maybe, just maybe, they could make it in Charlotte, Orlando or Nashville, because, after all, their neighbors did.
So, go ahead, Charleston — continue to nickel-and-dime your citizens. Just be sure to tell the last one out to turn off the lights.
Garrett Ballengee is the executive director of the Cardinal Institute for West Virginia Policy.